While away on vacation my company had some software installed that required a
new instance of SQL Server 2K to be created on our existing active/passive
cluster.
Because the techs doing the install did not know the password for our domain
cluster user account they created the standalone instance on the db server.
What I need to know is how do I go about migrating it to a clustered instance
instead of a standalone so as to take advantage of the failover capabilities?
i.e. I already have a clustered server with one clustered instance. They
installed a standalone instance alongside and now I need to migrate the new
instance to another named clustered instance.
Is it possible to go with the existing clustered instance and simply move
the DB's to the cluster? What's driving the need for two instances?
Tom
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
SQL Server MVP
Columnist, SQL Server Professional
Toronto, ON Canada
www.pinpub.com
..
"Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F9743B37-FC4D-4909-A4CA-608078BB5A3E@.microsoft.com...
While away on vacation my company had some software installed that required
a
new instance of SQL Server 2K to be created on our existing active/passive
cluster.
Because the techs doing the install did not know the password for our domain
cluster user account they created the standalone instance on the db server.
What I need to know is how do I go about migrating it to a clustered
instance
instead of a standalone so as to take advantage of the failover
capabilities?
i.e. I already have a clustered server with one clustered instance. They
installed a standalone instance alongside and now I need to migrate the new
instance to another named clustered instance.
|||Oh you'll love this...
The software we purchased for our new document management system *cough*
Documentum *cough*, is designed so as to require a case-sensitive database.
I know...D-U-M Dum...And because all of our other databases are NOT
case-sensitive (and there's no way in h*ll I would change that) we had to
create a new instance that was.
"Tom Moreau" wrote:
> Is it possible to go with the existing clustered instance and simply move
> the DB's to the cluster? What's driving the need for two instances?
> --
> Tom
> ----
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
> SQL Server MVP
> Columnist, SQL Server Professional
> Toronto, ON Canada
> www.pinpub.com
> ..
> "Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:F9743B37-FC4D-4909-A4CA-608078BB5A3E@.microsoft.com...
> While away on vacation my company had some software installed that required
> a
> new instance of SQL Server 2K to be created on our existing active/passive
> cluster.
> Because the techs doing the install did not know the password for our domain
> cluster user account they created the standalone instance on the db server.
> What I need to know is how do I go about migrating it to a clustered
> instance
> instead of a standalone so as to take advantage of the failover
> capabilities?
> i.e. I already have a clustered server with one clustered instance. They
> installed a standalone instance alongside and now I need to migrate the new
> instance to another named clustered instance.
>
|||That's not justification enough. You can create a case-sensitive database
within an instance that is not case sensitive.
Tom
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
SQL Server MVP
Columnist, SQL Server Professional
Toronto, ON Canada
www.pinpub.com
..
"Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A8F1525E-3D96-4842-AFBD-87160EC34CB8@.microsoft.com...
Oh you'll love this...
The software we purchased for our new document management system *cough*
Documentum *cough*, is designed so as to require a case-sensitive database.
I know...D-U-M Dum...And because all of our other databases are NOT
case-sensitive (and there's no way in h*ll I would change that) we had to
create a new instance that was.
"Tom Moreau" wrote:
> Is it possible to go with the existing clustered instance and simply move
> the DB's to the cluster? What's driving the need for two instances?
> --
> Tom
> ----
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
> SQL Server MVP
> Columnist, SQL Server Professional
> Toronto, ON Canada
> www.pinpub.com
> ..
> "Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:F9743B37-FC4D-4909-A4CA-608078BB5A3E@.microsoft.com...
> While away on vacation my company had some software installed that
> required
> a
> new instance of SQL Server 2K to be created on our existing active/passive
> cluster.
> Because the techs doing the install did not know the password for our
> domain
> cluster user account they created the standalone instance on the db
> server.
> What I need to know is how do I go about migrating it to a clustered
> instance
> instead of a standalone so as to take advantage of the failover
> capabilities?
> i.e. I already have a clustered server with one clustered instance. They
> installed a standalone instance alongside and now I need to migrate the
> new
> instance to another named clustered instance.
>
|||Not that it will matter much anyway, since it is already installed, but how
do you go about making a case-sensitive db inside of an insensitive instance?
And I still need to know how to change the standalone to a clustered...
"Tom Moreau" wrote:
> That's not justification enough. You can create a case-sensitive database
> within an instance that is not case sensitive.
> --
> Tom
> ----
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
> SQL Server MVP
> Columnist, SQL Server Professional
> Toronto, ON Canada
> www.pinpub.com
> ..
> "Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A8F1525E-3D96-4842-AFBD-87160EC34CB8@.microsoft.com...
> Oh you'll love this...
> The software we purchased for our new document management system *cough*
> Documentum *cough*, is designed so as to require a case-sensitive database.
> I know...D-U-M Dum...And because all of our other databases are NOT
> case-sensitive (and there's no way in h*ll I would change that) we had to
> create a new instance that was.
> "Tom Moreau" wrote:
>
>
|||To create a database with a case-sensitive collation, just use the COLLATE
option:
create database MyDB
collate Latin1_General_CS_AI
As for the other bit, you'll have to create the new virtual server (and
named instance) in the same manner as you created the other virtual server
and instance. However, you can specify the collation for the new instance
at that time. Once that's done, then backup and restore the DB's from the
standalone to the new instance. Finally, remove the standalone.
Tom
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
SQL Server MVP
Columnist, SQL Server Professional
Toronto, ON Canada
www.pinpub.com
..
"Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FBFC5A77-4A41-4B6E-B076-370E9111321B@.microsoft.com...
Not that it will matter much anyway, since it is already installed, but how
do you go about making a case-sensitive db inside of an insensitive
instance?
And I still need to know how to change the standalone to a clustered...
"Tom Moreau" wrote:
> That's not justification enough. You can create a case-sensitive database
> within an instance that is not case sensitive.
> --
> Tom
> ----
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
> SQL Server MVP
> Columnist, SQL Server Professional
> Toronto, ON Canada
> www.pinpub.com
> ..
> "Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A8F1525E-3D96-4842-AFBD-87160EC34CB8@.microsoft.com...
> Oh you'll love this...
> The software we purchased for our new document management system *cough*
> Documentum *cough*, is designed so as to require a case-sensitive
> database.
> I know...D-U-M Dum...And because all of our other databases are NOT
> case-sensitive (and there's no way in h*ll I would change that) we had to
> create a new instance that was.
> "Tom Moreau" wrote:
>
>
|||Creating a database in an instance with a collation that is differnt than
the default server collation, as Tom suggested, is certainly one approach
you can explore. If everything is under your control, you can make this
work. A vendor package like Ducumentum, however, may crap out becasue of the
likely collation conflict with the tempdb database. So test it out!
Linchi
"Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FBFC5A77-4A41-4B6E-B076-370E9111321B@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Not that it will matter much anyway, since it is already installed, but
> how
> do you go about making a case-sensitive db inside of an insensitive
> instance?
> And I still need to know how to change the standalone to a clustered...
>
> "Tom Moreau" wrote:
|||Question regarding what Linchi wrote about the temp DB being an issue. We
are currently in the same situation with a mulitnode cluster that will house
a peoplesoft instance (different collation than the other instances) but have
concerns on how failover will happen with this different collation instance
vs the collation instances that are indentical. Will failover happen just as
if all the collations were the same or do we have to take special precautions?
"Linchi Shea" wrote:
> Creating a database in an instance with a collation that is differnt than
> the default server collation, as Tom suggested, is certainly one approach
> you can explore. If everything is under your control, you can make this
> work. A vendor package like Ducumentum, however, may crap out becasue of the
> likely collation conflict with the tempdb database. So test it out!
> Linchi
> "Cary" <Cary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:FBFC5A77-4A41-4B6E-B076-370E9111321B@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||Multiple collations are no different on a cluster than on a stand-alone box.
Failover will work exactly the same regardless of the system or anyuser
database collation. Collations have been separated from the system code
page since SQL 7.0
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Todd" <Todd@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:32F54FD8-2882-4125-8202-D6CE442C83E5@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Question regarding what Linchi wrote about the temp DB being an issue. We
> are currently in the same situation with a mulitnode cluster that will
> house
> a peoplesoft instance (different collation than the other instances) but
> have
> concerns on how failover will happen with this different collation
> instance
> vs the collation instances that are indentical. Will failover happen just
> as
> if all the collations were the same or do we have to take special
> precautions?
> "Linchi Shea" wrote:
